Niacin
20 mg · 125% DVOne of two ingredients with an individually stated amount. The body converts niacin to NAD, a coenzyme central to how cells release energy from food.
Read moreEight pages covering what each ingredient is, what published research examines, its role in this formula, and where the evidence stops.
A vitamin, a mineral, two amino acid components and four botanical extracts.
Niacin 20 mg and zinc 11 mg, declared individually.
Sharing 570 mg, with no per-ingredient split published.
One of two ingredients with an individually stated amount. The body converts niacin to NAD, a coenzyme central to how cells release energy from food.
Read moreAn essential mineral involved in immune function, wound healing and hormone metabolism. The form matters here, and the label names it.
Read moreA precursor to nitric oxide, which relaxes blood vessels. Of the six blend ingredients this has the most developed circulation research behind it.
Read moreInvolved in transporting fatty acids into cells to be used for fuel — a genuine mechanism with a substantial research literature.
Read moreA source of proanthocyanidins studied for antioxidant activity and circulatory support. The label does not name a standardised branded version.
Read moreA Peruvian root with long traditional use and a growing set of small human trials around mood, energy and general vitality.
Read moreA source of resveratrol and related polyphenols, most often studied for antioxidant and cardiovascular activity.
Read moreOne of the most expensive botanicals by weight, with a research base sitting mostly around mood support.
Read moreThe eight divide into three groups. A vitamin and a mineral — niacin and zinc — both with individually stated amounts and both with established nutritional roles. Two amino acid components — L-citrulline and L-carnitine — each with a genuine research literature. And four botanical extracts — pine bark, maca root, grape skin and saffron stigmas.
That is a legible structure, and it is more coherent than a long list of botanicals whose individual contributions cannot be separated.
Two of the eight ingredients carry individually stated amounts: niacin at 20 mg and zinc at 11 mg. The remaining six sit inside a 570 mg proprietary blend with no per-ingredient breakdown published.
That is the central limitation of this label. 570 mg is the combined total across six ingredients, and how it splits between them is not disclosed. Published research on L-citrulline or maca root uses particular doses — often several grams in the case of citrulline — and without a breakdown those figures cannot be mapped onto what is actually in the capsule.
Proprietary blends are common across this category rather than unusual, and their use here is not evidence of anything untoward. It does mean dose comparison against the research is impossible, and any page implying otherwise is overreaching.
No per-ingredient amounts have been estimated anywhere on this site.
The eight ingredients are genuine subjects of published nutritional research. L-citrulline has the most developed circulation literature of anything on the panel. L-carnitine has a substantial history in fatty-acid transport and energy metabolism. Niacin's role in NAD production is textbook biochemistry. Zinc's involvement in hormone metabolism is well established.
None of that is evidence about this product. That research examines single ingredients at their own doses. No finished-product clinical trial on AlphaRock has been published, and no independent laboratory testing of the finished product was located.
The research is a reason to consider the formula. It is not a prediction of what the formula will do for you, particularly when six of the eight ingredients sit inside a blend that does not publish its own breakdown.
The NIH Office of Dietary Supplements publishes plain-language fact sheets on zinc, niacin and exercise-related supplements if you want to read the underlying material yourself. Their inclusion here does not indicate that any organisation named endorses, recommends or is affiliated with AlphaRock.
The label specifies zinc oxide, and naming the form is better disclosure than many labels manage.
Per the NIH Office of Dietary Supplements, absorption from zinc oxide runs at roughly 50 per cent, against approximately 61 per cent for zinc citrate or gluconate. It is the least well absorbed of the common supplement forms.
That is not a problem so much as context: it is worth knowing what 11 mg on a label translates to in practice, and it is the kind of detail that only becomes visible when a brand names the form rather than writing “zinc” and leaving it there.
Related reading: the six benefit areas, how the formula is meant to work, the wellness journal, and the product overview.
Every order is covered by a 60-day satisfaction window. Because the formula is built for cumulative use rather than a same-day effect, that is a sensible length of time to judge it in.
The start date differs between the brand's own documents. Its Refund Policy and sales page describe the window as running from the original purchase date; its Terms of Service describes it as running from the delivery date. With shipping quoted at 3 to 10 business days, that gap can exceed a week. Get the applicable date confirmed in writing before you rely on it.
A once-daily, stimulant-free male performance support capsule with a panel that matches its label, sold with a 60-day satisfaction window. Read the formula page first — it sets out what the label confirms and what it leaves open.